OVERVIEW

Purpose-built business apps.
One shared company platform.

Install a ready-made app or build one around your own process. A CRM still feels like a CRM and a budget app still feels like a budget app, but they read the same people, the same permissions and the same customer records. Start with one, add more when you need them.

The stackAcme Ltd, 40 people
# what we usually find at 40 people 14 subscriptions one per problem, three overlapping 6 spreadsheets the ones the company actually runs on 3 shared inboxes approvals, requests, onboarding 1 person who knows how all of it fits together ✗ one customer list nobody has it
FIG.01

Apps you already recognise.

Twenty of them so far, from a sales pipeline to purchase approvals to who is holding which laptop. These four are the ones you can look at properly today.

SALES

Sales CRM

For the founder who still does most of the selling: a pipeline board where every open deal has a next step and a date, and a forecast weighted by stage.

See Sales CRM →
SUPPORT

Helpdesk

Everyone asks the IT or office person for things in chat and in the corridor. With this, every request lands in one queue with an owner and a due date.

See Helpdesk →
HR

Employees

The HR person at a fifty-person company gets one record per employee instead of a spreadsheet and a drive folder, and every pay or job change stays as history.

See Employees →
PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Projects

Your team plans in Asana and keeps each project’s cost in a spreadsheet next to it. Put the effort and cost on the tasks instead, and the project adds them up.

See Projects →

None of them arrives with its own user list. See the whole library, or keep reading for what they share.

FIG.02

What every app already has.

The reason a CRM and a purchase approval app can sit next to each other here is that neither one owns your company. The people, the teams, the organizations you sell to and buy from, and the rules about who may see what are the platform's, not the app's. An app reads them.

So a new app starts with your colleagues already in it and your reporting lines already right. Nobody re-enters the customer list, nobody maintains a second copy of who works here, and a change of address is one edit rather than four.

  • PEOPLE One record per colleague, read by every app
  • RIGHTS One permission model, not one per tool
  • COMPANY One record per organization you work with
  • HISTORY Field-level history, everywhere, by default
FIG.03

Four signs this is you.

Most companies we talk to recognise at least three of these. If you recognise all four, we built this for you.

SAAS

The subscription list keeps growing

Every problem got its own tool. Three of them hold a copy of your customer list, two are paid for by someone who has left, and the invoices arrive from eleven vendors in eleven formats.

EXCEL

The company still runs on spreadsheets

The holiday planner, the asset list, the pipeline, the onboarding checklist. They work until the second person needs them, and then nobody is sure which file is current.

GERMANY

The data has to stay in Germany

You need hosting you can name, a processing agreement you can hand to a customer, and a record of who changed what. Not for a certificate on the wall, for the next audit and the next tender.

AI

People are already building with AI

Somebody made something genuinely useful last month in a tool nobody approved. The question is no longer whether to allow it. It is where it should run and who owns it afterwards.

None of these is a software problem on its own. Together they are the reason the fifth tool costs more than the first four.

FIG.04

The size we build for.

Most of the companies we work with have between ten and a few hundred people. Big enough that a spreadsheet with six editors is a real risk and that somebody has to answer for who saw what. Small enough that there is no platform team to ask and no budget for a six-month rollout.

There is usually no IT department, or there is one person who is also doing three other jobs. That shapes the whole product. Nobody here has time to learn an app-building platform, and nobody wants to become the administrator of the tool they asked for.

  • SIZE Ten to a few hundred people, growing
  • IT No IT department, or one person wearing four hats
  • SKILL Somebody who can describe a process, not design a schema
  • BILL One platform to pay for, instead of eleven subscriptions
FIG.05

And the people inside it.

The managing director is usually the one counting the subscriptions. The team lead is the one whose process lives in a spreadsheet and who has given up asking for software. The technical person, if there is one, is the one who quietly inherited every tool anybody ever built.

Cordango is aimed at the first two. Somebody who understands the work describes it and gets a working app, and the technical person stops being the single point of failure because the app belongs to the company rather than to whoever set it up.

  • OWNS The process expert describes the app, in business words
  • SAFE The technical person stops inheriting other people's tools
  • CLEAR One place to answer where the data lives and who may see it
Who calls usFirst conversation
# who usually brings us in ✔ the managing director tired of the subscription list ✔ the ops or team lead owns the process, not the tooling ✔ the one technical person who ends up maintaining everything # what they all ask first ? where does the data live ? what happens when the person who built it leaves
FIG.06

German and EU by default, not as an upgrade.

Cordango is built and hosted in Germany on EU infrastructure, GDPR-first. One data processing agreement instead of one per tool. One field-level history across every app, so who changed what is a question with an answer. Single sign-on is included rather than sold as an enterprise tier.

It matters most at the moment somebody asks where a particular piece of company data actually sits. Across eleven subscriptions that question takes a week and three support tickets. Here it has one answer, and a new app does not add a new one.

  • DE Built and hosted in Germany, on EU infrastructure
  • GDPR One processing agreement, not one per tool
  • LOG Field-level history across every app
  • REVIEW A new app adds nothing new for a review to assess
FIG.07

When Cordango is not the answer.

— worth saying plainly

Keep your payroll and your accounting where the law and your tax advisor expect them. Those are specialist products with specialist obligations, and replacing them with something you generated yourself is a bad trade. Cordango runs the operational apps around them.

If you have a developer team that wants SQL and JavaScript against databases you already run, Retool, Appsmith and ToolJet are built for exactly that. If you must own the infrastructure, they self-host and we do not. And if you are an enterprise with a platform team and a five-year roadmap, you are not who we designed this for. We would rather you knew that before the trial than after it.

  • KEEP Payroll, accounting and anything with its own legal obligations
  • CODE Maximum SQL and JavaScript control lives elsewhere
  • HOST Cordango is a managed service. If you must own the servers, we lose that row
MORE

Further reading

NEXT

Bring one process.
We will turn it into an app.

The fastest way to find out whether this fits your company is to watch one of your own processes become a working app. About 30 minutes, on a real company platform.